– Advertisement –
About the Author: Franz Bergmueller is the chief executive officer of SEBA Bank, a digital-asset bank.
Digital assets are at an inflection point. Institutional engagement with the asset class is reaching unprecedented levels. This development may seem strange given the significant declines we have seen in the crypto markets, but this bear market is different from any we have seen before.
– Advertisement –
Despite the short-term volatility, institutional players are now looking to the long term when it comes to digital assets. This summer has seen major asset managers including abradani, black Rock, and Charles Schwab Invest in digital-asset offerings. These developments are representative of a broader trend, with a wide spectrum of investors struggling to gain access to the sector. According to a report by PwC earlier this year, more than one third Traditional hedge funds now invest in digital assets, which is almost double the figure from a year ago.
This year has also seen the collapse of several centralized-finance companies. Known as CeFi, these are relatively traditional financial firms that specialize in digital assets. Many are lightly regulated, if at all. Major failures have also radically reshaped the strategy of going to the market for many investors. lending platform Celsius, Sailor And Vault All have declared bankruptcy and it is not clear to clients what will happen to their assets. Investors looking to participate in the space are now demanding transparency, asset safety and deposit protection.
Demand is here, led by a new understanding that this is a volatile asset class. However, the industry needs to address several key concerns so that institutional investors can act with confidence in the sector and unlock the next phase of growth.
we can start by Learning from CeFi Wipeout. The collapse of several CeFi platforms comes with a stern warning to investors. Although these platforms mimicked traditional banks, albeit on the blockchain, the lack of supervision or regulation controlling their behavior meant that their business model would never be sustainable. The model was exposed as there was significant market turbulence, and it became apparent that some platforms did not have enough deposits to support withdrawals from clients.
Their failure is a warning that there must be a clear set of rules of the road for institutional investors to engage with digital assets at large. The world’s largest asset managers will not engage in markets where basic financial needs are not met, or effectively supervised. To encourage such companies to engage with digital assets, regulatory authorities need to establish liquidity and capital requirements. They need to implement and effectively monitor standardized deposit protections for investors.
Many investors have still not received the funds deposited with the bankrupt CEFI platform. The fledgling legal and regulatory framework on digital assets in many jurisdictions means it is unclear when they will receive the funds, or even how much they will be entitled to. Regulation should address these issues.
Several jurisdictions have taken the lead in digital asset regulation: Switzerland and Singapore have two of the most well-established frameworks, providing clear rules for operators to engage with trust in the sector. These jurisdictions are now being linked by other states that are keen to unlock the development and innovation that is taking place in the region.
in june EU agrees on a landmark regulatory bill on digital assets, The “Market in Cryptocurrency Assets” harmonizes regulations on digital assets and infrastructure in 27 member states and empowers the European Securities and Markets Authority to ban or prohibit crypto platforms that fail to adequately protect investors. Huh. This will help ensure that large institutional players can invest in the digital asset space with confidence.
Other major financial centers are looking at EU plans. Specifically, President Biden’s Executive Order on Crypto has forced US regulatory agencies to work together to develop a comprehensive, comprehensive framework for the asset class. Similarly, the UK has announced its intention to become a global digital asset hub, the Treasury has announced that it will develop a regulatory framework and “Financial Market Infrastructure SandboxTo enable firms to innovate in this area.
States would be better off cooperating as they develop regulation. Doing so will prevent re-occurrence of existing conflicts in our financial infrastructure. This regulation should consider the repercussions of the CEFI slowdown and mandate greater transparency as well as stricter capital and liquidity requirements for operators.
The final piece of the institutional puzzle lies in security. above $2.4 billion fund There have been hacks or exploits in the crypto industry since January. Investors need institutional-grade infrastructure to reduce the risk of their assets being compromised.
Notable debate has focused on the merits of key-management technologies specialized for institutions. Investors should look beyond technology when evaluating counterparties. Regular independent reporting on custody resolution should be considered an essential security requirement, while deposit insurance can also guarantee reimbursement in the event of a settlement.
As shown by the collapse of CeFi, regulators also require companies to segregate assets on their balance sheets. The assets of investors using counterparties without separation are at risk in the event of a financial collapse.
It is clear that institutional engagement with digital assets is entering a new phase of development. Initial steps are being taken to develop clear regulation and availability of mature institutional-grade infrastructure to encourage investors to participate in the sector with greater confidence. Digital assets and their associated infrastructure will play an important role in the future of financial services. Now with a blueprint for institutional adoption in place, it’s up to investors to ensure they don’t risk being left behind.
Such guest comments are written by writers outside of Barron’s and Marketwatch newsrooms. They reflect the viewpoints and views of the authors. Submit commentary proposals and other feedback to [email protected]